Leadership In Julius Ceasar Essay -- William Shakespeare

In Shakespe ars catastrophe Julius Caesar, the use of diverse leaders plays an important role in the plot, present vividly how strong personalities conflict. This is the case with Brutus and Cassius, the both leaders among the several conspirators. The baloney of Julius Caesar is set in ancient Rome during a time when Julius Caesar is to live king. This, however, angers Cassius, a nobleman, and he plots with Brutus and others to kill him before he becomes king. They do mediocre that, justifying their actions by saying Caesar was in like manner ambitious and would lose gone amuck with power. This backfires with the Roman citizens after an emotional speech by Mark Antony, Caesars right hand man. This forces the conspirators to flee Rome and go to war with Antony and at last take their own lives. Because of their great leadership qualities, Brutus and Cassius take the leader roles among the conspirators. Nevertheless, they at times do argue over the course of action. Though B rutus and Cassius are both similar in that they are great leaders, their differences in component part are instrumental in determining the conclusion of the play.Despite their differences, Brutus and Cassius have similar traits that give rise to great leaders. some(prenominal) Brutus and Cassius are noble, prehensile men. They usually have good intentions and understand the situation they are in. This is wherefore they both agree to go along with the conspiracy to kill Caesar. The cardinal also like to think out and plan their actions. They do this two signifi stick outt times in the play. When the two plan Caesars assassination and during the planning of the final move for Brutus and Cassius army. When the assassination is developing, Cassius thinks to kill Antony as tumesce as Caesar saying, Mark Antony, so well beloved of Caesar, Should outlive Caesar. We shall take in of him A shrewd contriver and you know his means, If he improve them, whitethorn well stretch so far As to annoy us all. Which to pr stillt, Let Antony and Caesar fall together (2.1.157-162). Brutus, however, responds with his own reasoning, Our course will seen too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack at the limbs, the likes of wrath in death and envy afterwards For Antony is but a limb of Caesar (2.1.163-166). They two are also self reliant and self-dependent. They can think and act for themselves as they should any great man says Cassius to Brutus, Me... ...derable differences in trust and loyalty are the ultimate factors that influence the conclusion of the play. Both of these characters have great qualities such as intelligence, self-dependence, and reasoning ability that piss them excellent leaders. It, however, is their differences that govern the end result of the conspiracy. The single most corking decision of the play was when the conspirators resolved not to kill Antony along with Caesar. Brutus consuming trust of Antony led him to believe Antony was not going to be a problem. There are many implications of leadership as seen in Julius Caesar. Those who prevail to exhibit strong leadership characteristics will have much more(prenominal) impact on those who tend to stand back and fall into the crowd, even if the decisions being made are illogical. When two strong leaders interact, in that respect usually is a disagreement on the course of action, which can be harmful for the group. The strong characters of Brutus and Cassius, and the weaker conspirators, prove both these conclusions. Works CitedShakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Houghton Mifflin Company. The riverbank Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston, 1994.