How Does Culture Impact On International Business Management Essay

How Does tillage Impact On Inter topic traffic Management EssayIntroductionThe shoot of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, put, 2002) examines the impression of dimensions of subject field and organisational stopping point differences on the exertion of external join venture (IJV). They practiced the data from a survey of executives from conjugation ventures among Indian partners and partners from other counties to do the research. Finally, Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Chen, Park (2002) nominate that there is a negative matter from civilization distance on the operation of external reefer venture originates from differences in field of in attaination polish and differences in governing bodyal destination. Whats much, they found that the presumed negative effect from acculturation distance on the operation of external interchangeable venture originates more from differences in organizational subtlety than from differences in subject field acculturation. The refore, from the conceive of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, Park, 2002), we faeces k nowadays that differences in study civilisation stick out a negative intrusion on the execution of instrument of externalistic formulate venture. Moreover, differences in organizational agri refinement besides boast a negative stupor on the per radiation patternance of world- blanket(a) joint venture. Now, we know that differences in issue ending and differences in organizational civilization both gift a pregnant jolt on the performance of the world-wide trade. Differences in stopping point betwixt partners live a momentous impact on the trans interior(a) lineage. Therefore, it is truly eventful and necessary for the external business people to study and regard how conclusion impact on the supranational business.Moreover, Sirmon and Lane (2004) state that when the athletic field of a social assembly is imminent to the value-creating activities of an confede racy, ethnic differences betwixt the partners members of that social congregation forget be more disruptive. From Sirmon and Lane (2004), we foot know that when ethnic differences surrounded by the partners argon genuinely relevant to the value-creating activities of an alliance, cultural differences result significantly fix the performance of the multinational business. Therefore, it is very important and worthy to study how the cultural differences between the partners impact the performance of planetary alliance. Whats more, Sirmon and Lane (2004) found that when the domain of a social aggroup is closer to the value-creating activities of an alliance, organizational refining differences between the partners members of that social group will be more disruptive than national ending differences. Furthermore, they likewise found that pro culture is the around relevant to the value-creating activities of an alliance. Therefore, when the domain of a social group is closer to the value-creating activities of an alliance, the superior culture differences between the partners members of that social group will be the most disruptive.From the study of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, Park, 2002) and the study of (Sirmon and Lane, 2004), the culture differences have a significant impact on the outside(a) business when the domain of a social group is closer to the value-creating activities of an alliance.This attempt will discuss how the culture impact on the outside(a) business. Moreover, this canvass will discuss how the culture differences impact the internationalististicist business ground on three main readings (Morrison, 2006, p.168), the study of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, Park, 2002) and the study of (Sirmon and Lane, 2004). Section 2 is definition of culture and international business. Section 3 is discussion and compend of how the culture differences impact the international business. Section 4 is the conclusion and swell-nigh suggestions.Section 2Definition of Culture and internationalist businessCultureIn request to discuss how the culture differences impact the international business, we must(prenominal) understand what culture is first. Culture can be broadly defined as , a learned, character, compelling, interrelated traffic circle of symbols whose meanings provide a set of orientations for members of a society (Terpstra and David, 1991, p.6). From (Morrison, 2006, p.169), we can know that culture has many aspects, for example, value, deportment, beliefs, converse, sport, euphony and customs. world(prenominal) BusinessIn order to discuss how the culture differences impact the international business, we should in like manner understand what international business is. From (Morrison, 2006, p.5), we know that an international business forms when business activities of a company straddle two or more countries. A world(a) business forms when a company expands to the expiration that a large portion of its business is outside its home dry land (Morrison, 2006, p.6). Salk and Shenkar (2001, p.163) give tongue to that International alliances reside at the confluence of unlike cultures which accept national, organizational and occupational cultures. Therefore, it is very important to study and understand how divers(prenominal) cultures impact on the international business.Section 3Discussion and psychoanalysis of how the culture differences impact the international business.Pothukuchi et al. (2002) found that partners cultural differences whitethorn have more deflect on the performance of international alliance as those differences become more without delay related to the alliances special value-creating activities. An international alliances performance is driven by the alliances effectiveness in achieving its primary value-creating activities. Moreover, Harrison et al. (2001) said that resourcefulness complementarity between partners of international all iance is often a necessary status to optimize this value creation. Therefore, in order to sh be, combine and leverage complemental resources, the partners employees must act effectively. Many researchers found that national and organizational culture differences between these employees affect their interactions. This means that differences in national and organizational culture have a significant impact on the performance of international business. It is very important and necessary for the international business people to study and understand different national cultures and organizational cultures.(Morrison, 2006, p.168) also said that culture differences can directly impact the success or failure of a project. He also said that achieving a in(predicate) outcome will depend on esthesia to differences in cultures between partners. This means sensitivity to differences in norms of behavior, value systems and speechs between the partners will impact the success or failure of a project. Whats more, Trompenaars (1994) also said that for international business, grasping the interacting cultural dynamic between the international and the local is the key to be successful. Therefore, for international business, sensitivity to differences in cultures and grasping the interacting cultural dynamic between the global and the local is very important because culture differences can directly affect the success or failure of a project.Moreover, Sirmon and Lane, (2004) said that cultural differences stems from national, organizational and professional cultures. The differences in national, organizational and professional culture can subdue international alliance partners employees ability to interact effectively. This essay will discuss how the culture differences affect the international business from three different aspects national culture, organizational culture, and professional culture. subject field CultureWe know that different countries have different culture s. From (Morrison, 2006, p.172), nations are distinguishable from from each one other by a dual-lane cultural history, for example, religion, language, or racial identity. Moreover, all these distinguishing characteristics blend into a national culture. commonalty language, shared apparitional, shared moral determine, shared history, kinship between the individual and group, and attitudes to education are all the elements of national culture. National culture relates primarily to implanted values (Hofstede et al., 1990). National culture influences family life, organizational culture, education, and sparing and political structures (Morrison, 2006, p.172). Sirmon and Lane, (2004) also said that the influence of national culture is strong and long lasting. Organizations, while they whitethorn develop their own special(prenominal) values and behavior, are also highly influenced by the national culture of their home country (Morrison, 2006, p.202). Moreover, Hofstede (1991) fo und that national culture explains 50% of the differences in managers attitudes, beliefs, and values. Albert (1991) said that national culture differences are clearly seen in economic and political systems, educational systems, and other institutions. Therefore, Sirmon and Lane, (2004) said that national culture differences between partners of the international alliance can challenge the development of successful relationships. Park and Ungson (1997) said that these challenges stem partially from the pretermit of shared norms or values. Moreover, this lack of common understanding whitethorn undermine the partners interpretation of each others strategical intent, which is crucial in global markets and partnerships (Hitt et al., 1995). Whats more, Hennart and Zengs (2002) research findings also suggests that differences in national culture can disrupt collaboration and skill between partners of the international alliance. Furthermore, Sirmon and Lane, (2004) said that a lack of sha red values and norms may humiliate effective communication, trust and knowledge sharing in joint ventures. They said that all these problems have been found to breaking wind to lower the performance of the international business.However, differences in national culture can be serious. For example, when the managers work with the inappropriate partners, they will spend more effort on avoiding misunderstandings in international alliances than they would in domestic alliances. In this compositors case, differences in national culture can pass by to high-level communication and a more sustained collaboration. Therefore, differences in national culture also have a good and demonstrable impact on the international business.Whats more, Chui et al. (2002) and Gibson (1999) also said that National culture has been shown to impact on major business activities, from capital structure to group performance. Now, we know that differences in national culture have a significant impact on th e international business. Therefore, it is very important to study and understand how the national culture impact on the international business. This essay will also discuss how the national culture impact on the international business by discussing and analyzing how language and religions impact on the international business.(1). LanguagesCommon language is an element of national culture. Language is the basic means of communication between people. Language facilitates social interaction and fosters a system of shared values and norms (Morrison, 2006, p.174). If partners of international alliance cannot have common language to communicate, they cannot work and interact because they cannot communicate. Business people cannot do business with the people who cover different languages. Nowadays, the importance of English as a global language extends far beyond the number of native speakers. English as a global language and common language helps people who speak different languages to communicate. English language is an intercultural means of communicating. Business people can use English in their international business activities. Business people now can do business with the people who speak different languages by using English. English helps the business people overcome the problems of intercultural communication in their international business activities. Therefore, having a common language is a very important necessary condition for international business. Today, most of South the States is Spanish-speaking, moreover, in recent years Spanish companies have expanded in the region, attracted by a perceived affinity with these markets derived from a common language(Morrison, 2006, p.175-176). Moreover, in a low-context culture, communication is clear and direct, such as America. In a high-context culture, much goes unsaid because ambiguity is the norm and directness is avoided, such as Asian cultures (Morrison, 2006, p.174-175). Difference in language culture w ill also impact international alliance partners employees communication and bottle up their ability to interact effectively. Therefore, knowing and understanding the partners language culture well is also very important for international business.(2). ReligionsThe system of values and beliefs that characterizes a culture may be embodied in a feature religion (Morrison, 2006, p.179). As well as unearthly power, religion may exercise healthy political power. It can form a major unifying advertise in society. In countries where religion is a major element of the cultural environment, sensitivity to local religious beliefs and practices is particularly important in edifice business relations (Morrison, 2006, p.180). look into has identified over 15,000 distinct religions and religious movements among the worlds population (Barrett, 1997). Therefore, there are many people who have religious beliefs in this world. Knowing the local religious beliefs and the business partners religi ous beliefs well is very important for the international business.Moreover, many social associations and political parties in many countries are commonly found on religious affiliations. Moreover, these form an essential dimension of the business environment. For example, the growth in membership and influence of large churches in parts of the US impacts on the social and cultural environment of the communities in which they are located. If there is an established religion in a location, a business must take account of its wide ramifications. If there are multiple religions in locations, a business as a good corporate citizen should not discriminate (Morrison, 2006, p.181-182). Knowing the business partners religious beliefs well will help to strike good outcomes. Do not know the business partners religious beliefs well may lead to the failure of your business. Therefore, we can know that it is particularly important and necessary for the international business to know the busines s partners local religious beliefs well.Whats more, many aspects of business life are directly (or indirectly) affected by religious beliefs and practices. For example, particular foods that are forbidden such as beef for Hindus ban or restrictions on consumption of alcoholic drink religious festivals during which work may be forbidden clothing requirements requirement for women and men to be discriminate in the work environment in Muslim societies and the ban on Sunday shopping in some countries (Morrison, 2006, p.187).Organizational CultureFrom the study of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, Park, 2002), we know that the negative effect on the performance of international joint venture originates more from differences in organizational culture than from differences in national culture. Whats more, from the study of (Sirmon and Lane, 2004), we know that when the domain of a social group is closer to the value-creating activities of an alliance, organizational culture differences between the partners members of that social group will be more disruptive than national culture differences. Therefore, from the study of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, Park, 2002) and the study of (Sirmon and Lane, 2004), we can know that organization culture has more impact on the international business. Organizational culture is very important for the international business.Therefore, in order to discuss how the culture differences impact the international business, we must understand what organizational culture is. From (Morrison, 2006, p.195), organizational culture or corporate culture, like national culture, focuses on values, norms and behavioral patterns shared by the organization. An organizational culture is mavin that is deliberately fostered among employees, who may have come to the company from a revolution of different cultural background. Characteristics of organizational culture include that, for example, common language, shared terminology, norms of behavior , and dominant values of the organization. Hofstede et al. (1990) said that whereas national culture relates primarily to deep-seated values, organizational culture relates primarily to shared beliefs in organizational practices and processes.weber et al. (1996) found that different organizational cultures between acquirer and target could slump top managers positive attitudes toward the merger and return their cooperation. Therefore, Sirmon and Lane, (2004) said that organizational culture is very important for the success of mergers and acquisitions. They sentiment that when the partners have the same organizational culture, satisfaction, learning and effectiveness of interactions will be increased. Therefore, same organizational culture between the partners has positive impact on the success of mergers and acquisitions. Whats more, they also thought that if the partners have different organizational cultures, satisfaction, learning and effectiveness of interactions will be dec reased. Moreover, from (Sirmon and Lane, 2004), we know when learning, satisfaction and effectiveness of interactions are decreased, the business processes used to share combine and leverage resources will be inhibited. Sirmon and Lane, (2004) said that it will be more difficult for partners who have different organizational cultures to effectively achieve the primary value-creating activities.Professional cultureFrom (Van Maanen and Barley, 1984 Jordan, 1990Brown and Duguid, 1991 Lave and Wenger, 1991), we know that professional cultures develop through the socialization. Individuals receive the socialization during their training and occupational education. then this socialization will be reinforced through the individuals professional experiences and interactions that lead to a broad understanding of how their occupation should be conducted. Moreover, Trice and Beyer (1993) said that professional cultures form as people, who span individual organizations, share a set of norms, v alues and beliefs related to their occupation. Sirmon and Lanes (2004) research findings suggests that professional culture differences are often the most relevant and salient cultural differences that the interacting employees face, and thus professional culture differences are the most disruptive to the alliances effectiveness in achieving its primary value-creating activitiesSection 4ConculsionThis essay discussed and analyzed that how the culture impact on the international business. Moreover, this essay discussed how the culture differences impact the international business based on three main readings (Morrison, 2006, p.168), the study of (Pothukuchi, Damanpour, Choi, Chen, Park, 2002) and the study of (Sirmon and Lane, 2004). After discussing how the culture differences impact the international business, we know thatAn international alliances performance is driven by the alliances effectiveness in achieving its primary value-creating activities. Moreover, resource complementa rity between partners of international alliance is often a necessary condition to optimize this value creation. In order to share, combine and leverage complementary resources, the partners employees must interact effectively. However, national and organizational culture differences between these employees affect their interactions. Therefore, partners cultural differences may have more influence on the performance of international alliance as those differences become more directly related to the alliances primary value-creating activities.Achieving a successful outcome will depend on sensitivity to differences in cultures between partners. This means sensitivity to differences in norms of behavior, value systems and languages between the partners will impact the success or failure of a project. Therefore, culture differences can directly impact the success or failure of a project.Cultural differences stems from national, organizational and professional cultures. The differences in national, organizational and professional culture can inhibit international alliance partners employees ability to interact effectively.Differences in national culture lead to the lack of shared norms and value. The lack of shared values and norms may reduce effective communication, trust and knowledge sharing in the international business. Moreover, this lack of common understanding may undermine the partners interpretation of each others strategic intent, which is crucial in global markets and partnerships. All these problems have been found to lead to lower the performance of the international business. Therefore, differences in national culture can disrupt collaboration and learning between partners of the international alliance. Differences in national culture may have a negative impact on the performance of the international business.In some circumstance, differences in national culture can lead to high-level communication and a more sustained collaboration between the partner s. Differences in national culture also have a good and positive impact on the international business. Therefore, differences in national culture can also be beneficial for the international business.Knowing and understanding the partners language culture well is also very important for international business.In countries where religion is a major element of the cultural environment, sensitivity to local religious beliefs and practices is particularly important in building business relations.When the domain of a social group is closer to the value-creating activities of an alliance, organizational culture differences between the partners members of that social group will be more disruptive than national culture differences. Therefore, the negative effect on the performance of international joint venture originates more from differences in organizational culture than from differences in national culture. Moreover, different organizational cultures between acquirer and target could de crease top managers positive attitudes toward the merger and decrease their cooperation. Organizational culture is very important for the success of mergers and acquisitions.Professional cultures form as people, who span individual organizations, share a set of norms, values and beliefs related to their occupation. Professional culture differences are often the most relevant and salient cultural differences that the interacting employees face, and thus professional culture differences are the most disruptive to the alliances effectiveness in achieving its primary value-creating activities.Some suggestion for the international business which reside at the confluence of different culturesMorrison, (2006, p.202) said that in the international environment, a polycentric approach will make it easier for the international organization to adapt to the different cultural environments of foreign operations. (Morrison, 2006, p.168) also said that joint ventures is a good way to make internati onal business relationships successful.Whats more, cultures are not fixed and static. Cultures can change. Therefore, organizations should be capable of change as they expand internationally because there are interactions between cultures and growth of international markets and global brands.Albert, M. (1991) Capitalisme contre Capitalisme, Paris Seuil.Barrett, D. (1997) Annual statistical table on global mission1997, International Bulletin of Missionary Research, 1 (1)24-5.Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization Science 2(1) 40-57.Chui, A.C.W., Lloyd, A.E. and Kwok, C.C.Y. (2002) The conclusion of capital structure is national culture a missing part to the puzzle? ledger of International Business Studies33(1) 99-127.Gibson, C.B. (1999) Do they do what they turn over they can? Group-efficacy beliefs and group performance across tasks and cultures, academy of Mana gement diary 42(2) 138-152.Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Ireland, R.D. (2001) Resource complementary in business combinations extending the logic to organizational alliances, Journal of Management 27 679-690.Hennart, J.-F. and Zeng, M. (2002) Cross-cultural differences and joint venture longevity, Journal of International Business Studies 33(4) 699-716.Hitt, M.A., Tyler, B.B., Hardee, C. and Park, D. (1995) Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace, Academy of Management Executive9 (2) 12-19.Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures, Organizations Software of the Mind, London McGraw-HillHofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D. and Sanders, G. (1990) Measuring organizational cultures a soft and quantitative study across twenty cases, Administrative Science quarterly 35 286-316.Jordan, A.T. (1990) Organizational culture and culture change a case study, Studies in Third World Societies 42 209-226.Lane, H.W. and Beamish, P.W. (1990) Cross-cultural cooperative behavi or in joint ventures in LDCs, Management International Review 30(special issue) 87-102.Lave, j. and Wenger, E. (1991) laid Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Lyles, M.A. and Salk, J.E. (1996) Knowledge acquisitions from forging parents in international joint ventures an empirical examination in the Hungarian context, Journal of International Business Studies 27(5) 877-903.Morrison, J. (2006), The International Business milieu, palgrave macmillanParkhe, A. (1991) Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity, Journal of International Business Studies 22(4) 579-601.Park, S.H. and Ungson, G.R. (1997) The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution, Academy of Management Journal 40(2) 279-307.Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C.C. and Park, S.H. (2002) National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance, Journal of International Business Studies 33 243-265.Salk, J.E. and Shenkar, O. (2001) Social identify in an international joint venture an explorative case study, Organization Science 12 161-178.Sirmon, D.G., and Lane, P.J. (2004), A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance, Journal of international Business Studies (2004) 35, 306-319.Terpstra, V. and David, K. (1991) The Cultural Environment of International Business (Cincinnati South-Western Publishing Co.).Trice, H.M. and Beyer, J.M. (1993) The Culture of Work Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.Trompenaars, F. (1994) go the Waves of Culture (New York Irwin).Van Maanen, j. and Barley, S.R. (1984) Occupational communities culture and control in organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior 6 287-365.Weber, Y., Shenkar, 0. and Raveh, A. (1996) National and corporate culture fit in mergers/acquisitions an exploratory study, Management Science 421215-1227.