Crito Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Crito - Personal Statement ExampleHis association with then Athenian administration landed him in prison (Melchert 103). Even afterward being locked behind bars, Socrates held on to his philosophic principles of life. Socrates was averse to abandon his quest for truth even after being advised so by his effort jury. He believed in his wisdom and the power of reasoning rather than illusion reality. His firm devotion to his convictions and pictures is illustrated hygienic in the Crito incident.Socrates was known to display a calm spirit concerning serious issues in his life. Even after being sentenced to death, Socrates accepted the jurys decision and maintained that giving up his philosophy at the expense of freedom signifies defeat. In this Crito incident, Socrates friends who had visited him in jail devised a designing of getting Socrates out of prison. However, Socrates occupied his friends through a series of rational evaluation of their plan. His friends were faced with an obligation to rescue Socrates because of the societys expectations on them, concerning Socrates sentence. As usual, Socrates subjected his friends idea into an evaluation on whether it was in concert with any moral values.The root word of his friends plan was the expectation of the people after Socrates had been unjustly sentenced to death. Despite this underlying reason for the plan, Socrates opted to question the plans validity at the moral arena. He engaged his friends on the quest for what is truly right. Socrates continuously argued that in the context of decision-making, what matters most is not the publics opinion but an individuals knowledge on the subject problem (Melchert 107). He argued that the public are fond of acting willy-nilly and usually fails to come up with rational justification of their actions. Socrates also based his argument on his belief that no one should think of doing something wrong, regardless of the state of affairs. He acknowledged the moral princ iple that it is not right to pay injustice with