'Can the Problem of Monarchy Be Considered Old-Fashioned?\r'

'Can the problem of sovereigny be considered old-fashioned? A monarchy is a administrational system that has one person as the permanent head of severalise until he or she dies or gives up his or her position. Typically, the position of monarch is hereditary, as is the slickness with famous monarchies like that of the United Kingdom. The bound is often used to refer to a system of government in which the monarch †such as a queen or queen †has absolute authority, unless many monarchies be limited or constitutional monarchies in which the monarch has dependent agency and might blush be mostly a figurehead quite a than a ruler.So ,the question is whether the problem of monarchy tail be considered old-fashioned or non? One typeface of a monarchy that is considered to be an advantage is that it can reduce or eliminate the struggle for ultimate power in spite of appearance the government. When the head of state moldiness be elected, members of different political p arties or factions lead compete for the position. This often creates member and conflict within the government. If the head of state serves for life and his or her successor is already known, it might increase the unity within the government.Still, the monarchy system represents a cultural customs for a clownish. In many places, even after the actual operation of the government has changed to a different system, a monarchy will be retained because it is an important aspect of the cultural and political history of the nation. The monarchs in these cases are living representatives of generations of rulers. They often are treated as figures of reverence. Moreover, the system of monarchy nub stability even prosperity .As an example, our country was doing well during monarchy system until the Russian commie took it and stole the land from the legal owners (peasants, well-situated battalion or business men). Everyone take a place where his or her family would be safe and a stable working place. This stability in society is decidedly attracting more and more people on the monarchy’s side. Another argument, which may go bad odd, is that people are more antipathetic to trust a king or a queen as the ‘ node’ of the country rather than a president.Believe it or not people still pack the idea of a king as a person who is standing on a big throne with a golden crown on his head, having a luxurious life and with an outstanding cognition as well (image that was took from fairy tales I guess) while a president is dear a simple tailored-suited person. In conclusion I deliberate that most people do not regard monarchy as an old-fashioned system. Moreover I think that this system is gaining more and more popularity as we have been experiencing many other systems which did not bring us prosperity at all.\r\n'